[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 3.107 # 俱舍論記 3.107 俱舍論記 3.107 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.107](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.3.107) 「如是已說至是所斷故」者，此即第六三斷分別門。意、喜、樂、捨若見惑相應，是見所斷，餘有漏是修所斷，若是無漏非所斷。憂根，若見惑相應是見所斷，餘有漏是修所斷，非無漏故不通非所斷。七色命、苦唯修所斷，七色、命根不染污故。苦根，非六生故非見所斷，皆有漏故唯修所斷，非無漏故不通非所斷。信等五根，非染污故不通見斷，通有漏故是修所斷，通無漏故是非所斷。最後三根，皆無漏故唯非所斷，非無過法是所斷故。又《正理》第九云「豈不聖道亦所斷耶？如契經：言應知聖道猶如船筏，法尚應斷何況非法。此非見、修二道所斷，入無餘依涅槃界位捨故名斷。 > Regarding "It has thus been explained ... because they are to be abandoned": this is the sixth section, the analysis of the three abandonments. If the mind, joy, pleasure, and equanimity are associated with afflictions \[abandoned by\] seeing, they are abandoned by seeing; the remaining sāsrava ones are abandoned by cultivation; if anāsrava, they are not to be abandoned. The faculty of grief, if associated with afflictions \[abandoned by\] seeing, is abandoned by seeing; the remaining sāsrava ones are abandoned by cultivation; because it is not anāsrava, it does not admit of being not to be abandoned. The seven material faculties, life, and pain are solely abandoned by cultivation, because the seven material faculties and the life faculty are undefiled. The faculty of pain, because it does not arise from the six \[defilements\], is not abandoned by seeing; because all \[its instances\] are sāsrava, it is solely abandoned by cultivation; because it is not anāsrava, it does not admit of being not to be abandoned. The five faculties beginning with faith, because they are not defiled, do not admit of abandonment by seeing; because they admit of being sāsrava, they are abandoned by cultivation; because they admit of being anāsrava, they are not to be abandoned. The final three faculties, because they are all anāsrava, are solely not to be abandoned, because faultless phenomena are not to be abandoned. Furthermore, the \*Nyāyānusāra\*, fascicle 9, says: "Is not the noble path also to be abandoned? As the sūtra states: One should know the noble path to be like a raft; even dharmas should be abandoned, how much more non-dharmas! This is not abandoned by the two paths of seeing and cultivation; it is called 'abandonment' because it is relinquished at the stage of entering the nirvāṇa element without remainder of substratum." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.106](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.3.106) - [Next: 3.108](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.3.108) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.3.107) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (4) - [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.3.143) — Classical Chinese - [俱舍論頌疏論本](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.3.67) — Classical Chinese - [阿毘達磨順正理論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.abhidharma.abhidharmakosa!nyayanusara*zh-xuanzang.9.33) — Classical Chinese - [阿毘達磨藏顯宗論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.abhidharma.abhidharmakosa!abhidharmakosasastrakarikabhasya*zh-xuanzang.5.29) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.3.107](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.3.107) · Pramāṇa