<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.6.129 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821) › 6.129

# 俱舍論記 6.129

俱舍論記 6.129

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [6.129](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.6.129)

「兩釋俱通已如前釋」者，解兩釋俱通，已如前界品五類分別十八界中辨。汝不應以持業難依主、依主難持業。故《正理》十六云「然異熟因或持業釋，故契經說異熟生眼。或依主釋，故契經云業之異熟。」

> Regarding "Both interpretations are valid, as already explained before": resolving this, both interpretations are valid, as already distinguished previously in the Dhātu-nirdeśa under the fivefold classification of the eighteen dhātus. You should not use the karmadhāraya to challenge the tatpuruṣa, nor use the tatpuruṣa to challenge the karmadhāraya. Thus Nyāyānusāra 16 states: "However, the cause of maturation is sometimes a karmadhāraya compound, which is why the sūtra says 'an eye born of maturation'; or it is a tatpuruṣa compound, which is why the sūtra says 'the maturation of karma.'"  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 6.128](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.6.128)
- [Next: 6.130](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.6.130)
- [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.6)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821~en-mt.6.129) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.6.129](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.6.129) · Pramāṇa
