[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 1.104 # 俱舍論疏 1.104 俱舍論疏 1.104 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.104](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1.104) 四、論同異者，擇滅無為隨繫事量，故知一一法上唯有一擇滅。又一切無學，皆於一切有漏法中證得擇滅。故知擇滅必定共證。《婆沙》通經云「問：若爾，何故涅槃名不共法？答：涅槃體雖是共，而就得說，名不共法，以離繫得，一一有情自相續中各別起故。」又引經說如來解脫與餘阿羅漢等無異，此就所證滅說。 > Fourth, discussing identity and difference: Analytical cessation corresponds in measure to the bound entities; thus we know that upon each individual phenomenon there is only one analytical cessation. Furthermore, all non-learners realize analytical cessation across all defiled-and-conditioned phenomena. Hence we know that analytical cessation is necessarily realized in common. The Vibhāṣā, harmonizing the sūtras, states: 'Question: If so, why is nirvāṇa called an uncommon phenomenon? Answer: Although the substance of nirvāṇa is common, it is called an uncommon phenomenon with reference to its acquisition, because the acquisition of disjunction arises separately in the individual continuum of each sentient being.' Furthermore, citing a sūtra, it states that the Tathāgata's liberation is no different from that of other arhats; this is spoken with reference to the cessation realized. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.103](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1.103) - [Next: 1.105](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1.105) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.1.104) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1.104](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1.104) · Pramāṇa