[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 1.105 # 俱舍論疏 1.105 俱舍論疏 1.105 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.105](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1.105) 五、斷不同者，今應依斷作句數分別。法有三種：一自身所得法、亦他身所得法、三非二所得法。一望自身所得七十五法分別者，有自性斷非所緣斷者，謂煩惱大地，不善大地，小煩惱地，不定中貪、嗔、慢、疑。有所緣斷非自性斷者，謂十色全，無表一分除無漏者，大善地法一分，不相應中除四相及得一分餘九不相應法全。亦自性斷亦所緣斷者，謂心王，十大地尋伺一分，及悔、眠全，四相及得一分有漏者。此等與自性斷相應、俱有及得，是自性斷也，非彼相應、俱有及得是所緣斷也。俱非句者，謂七十五法中是無漏法者皆非二斷。若通就他身作問答者，但自性斷皆所緣斷，自結一果等他所斷故。總有三句，除自性斷非所緣斷。若他身所得法及非二所得法有漏者，但有所緣斷一句。無漏者，俱非句。 > Fifth, concerning distinctions in abandonment: One should now distinguish \[these dharmas\] in terms of the four alternatives according to abandonment. There are three kinds of dharmas: (1) dharmas acquired in one's own continuum; (2) dharmas acquired in another's continuum; and (3) dharmas acquired in neither. (1) Distinguishing the seventy-five dharmas with respect to those acquired in one's own continuum: Dharmas abandoned through intrinsic nature and not through the cognitive object are: the mahābhūmika defilements, the akuśalamahābhūmikas, the parittakleśabhūmikas, and attachment, aversion, conceit, and doubt among the aniyatas. Dharmas abandoned through the cognitive object and not through intrinsic nature are: all ten kinds of form; avijñapti in part, excluding the anāsrava; a portion of the kuśalamahābhūmika dharmas; and, among the viprayuktas, all the other nine viprayukta dharmas, excluding the four characteristics and a portion of prāpti. Dharmas abandoned both through intrinsic nature and through the cognitive object are: the mind-king; vitarka and vicāra in part from among the ten mahābhūmikas; remorse and torpor entirely; and the four characteristics and the portion of prāpti that are sāsrava. When these are associated with, coexistent with, or the prāpti of what is abandoned through intrinsic nature, they are abandoned through intrinsic nature; when they are not associated with, coexistent with, or the prāpti thereof, they are abandoned through the cognitive object. As for the alternative of being neither: among the seventy-five dharmas, those that are anāsrava are neither of the two abandonments. If one formulates the inquiry broadly with respect to another's continuum: whatever is abandoned through intrinsic nature is abandoned through the cognitive object, because one's own bond, a single fruit, and so forth are abandoned by others. In total there are three alternatives, excluding 'abandoned through intrinsic nature and not through the cognitive object.' If dharmas acquired in another's continuum or dharmas acquired in neither are sāsrava, there is only the single alternative of being abandoned through the cognitive object. If they are anāsrava, they fall under the alternative of being neither. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.104](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1.104) - [Next: 1.106](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1.106) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.1.105) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1.105](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.1.105) · Pramāṇa