[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 10.4 # 俱舍論疏 10.4 俱舍論疏 10.4 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [10.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10.4) 論「謂體非明」，此則答也。答中有三：前二不正答、後一舉頌正答。就不正中有二：一以非明故名曰無明、二以明無故名曰無明。此是前答。所以名無明者，以非明故。 > The treatise says: "It means its entity is not clarity." This is the answer. Within the answer there are three parts: the first two are indirect answers, and the last is a direct answer citing a verse. Within the indirect answers there are two: first, naming it "ignorance" because it is non-clarity; second, naming it "ignorance" because there is an absence of clarity. This is the former answer: the reason it is called ignorance is because it is non-clarity. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 10.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10.3) - [Next: 10.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10.5) - [Up: 10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.10.4) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10.4) · Pramāṇa