[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 10.7 # 俱舍論疏 10.7 俱舍論疏 10.7 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [10.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10.7) 論「若爾無明體應非有。破也。若明無故名曰無明。無明即應明無為性」，無明若以明無為性，無明即應體非有也。 > The treatise says: "If so, the entity of ignorance should not exist." This is a refutation. "If it is named ignorance because of the absence of clarity, then ignorance would have the absence of clarity as its nature"; if ignorance has the absence of clarity as its nature, then the entity of ignorance would not exist. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 10.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10.6) - [Next: 10.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10.8) - [Up: 10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.10.7) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.10.7) · Pramāṇa