<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.11.20 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 11.20

# 俱舍論疏 11.20

俱舍論疏 11.20

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [11.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.11.20)

論「謂必無容至法滅法生」，出違理也。此意欲說金之與器體性無別，如何說有別法是常？別法生滅，謂冥諦常，二十三諦是無常也。

> The commentary presents what conflicts with reason: "Namely, it is entirely impossible... an attribute perishes and an attribute arises." The intention here is to say that between gold and the vessel there is no difference in essence; how could one say that an attribute apart \[from it\] is permanent, while another attribute arises and perishes? That is, the unmanifest principle (pradhāna) is permanent, while the twenty-three principles are impermanent.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 11.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.11.19)
- [Next: 11.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.11.21)
- [Up: 11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.11)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.11.20) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.11.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.11.20) · Pramāṇa
