[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 13.71 # 俱舍論疏 13.71 俱舍論疏 13.71 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [13.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.13.71) 論「若爾何故至此二何異」，有部難。經言思業，明知是思；經言思已業，明知非是思。如何三業以思為體？ > On the Śāstra's statement: "If so, why \[... to ...\] how do these two differ?": The Sarvāstivādins challenge. The sūtra speaks of "intentional karma" (cetanā-karman), so clearly we know it is intention; the sūtra speaks of "karma having intended" (cetayitvā-karman), so clearly we know it is not intention. How can the three karmas have intention as their substance? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 13.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.13.70) - [Next: 13.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.13.72) - [Up: 13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.13) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.13.71) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.13.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.13.71) · Pramāṇa