[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 16.33 # 俱舍論疏 16.33 俱舍論疏 16.33 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [16.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16.33) 論「若爾則應至合成一體」，有部難也。貪、瞋、邪見，兩宗共許是煩惱故。此若是業，業與煩惱合成一體，無明應即行，愛、取即有，業障應即是煩惱障。 > On the text, "If so, then \[...\] would merge into a single entity": The Sarvāstivādins object. Both schools agree that covetousness, malice, and wrong view are afflictions. If these were karma, then karma and affliction would merge into a single entity; ignorance (avidyā) would be formations (saṃskāra), craving (tṛṣṇā) and grasping (upādāna) would be existence (bhava), and the karmic obstacle (karmāvaraṇa) would be the affliction obstacle (kleśāvaraṇa). > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 16.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16.32) - [Next: 16.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16.34) - [Up: 16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.16.33) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16.33) · Pramāṇa