<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16.55 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 16.55

# 俱舍論疏 16.55

俱舍論疏 16.55

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [16.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16.55)

論「七善業道至必依表故」，明善業中若從受生定有表、無表也。言「受生」者，簡非受生及道、定色。受生有二：一者處中，謂別受遠離，定有表及無表；二受律儀，即容平發。然定依自身表業而發，自身定有表及無表。

> The Śāstra \[states\], from "The seven wholesome karmapathas" up to "because it necessarily relies on manifest \[action\]": this clarifies that among wholesome actions, if they arise from reception \[of precepts\], they definitely have both manifest and non-manifest \[action\]. Saying "arise from reception" excludes those not arising from reception, as well as the matter of the Path and meditative absorption. Arising from reception is of two kinds: first, intermediate, namely the specific reception of abstention, which definitely has manifest and non-manifest \[action\]; second, receiving the saṃvara, which may arise neutrally. However, it definitely arises in reliance upon the manifest action of one's own body, so one's own body definitely has manifest and non-manifest \[action\].  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 16.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16.54)
- [Next: 16.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16.56)
- [Up: 16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.16.55) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.16.55) · Pramāṇa
