[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 2.16 # 俱舍論疏 2.16 俱舍論疏 2.16 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.2.16) 論「若法境界有對至是第四句」，第七句數分別也。文中有二：一境界對障礙四句、二境界對所緣順後句。此第一也。第一句是境界有對非障礙、第二句是障礙非境界、第三俱句、第四俱非，竝可解。 > The treatise says: "If a phenomenon has objective opposition... is the fourth alternative." This is the seventh \[section\], which analyzes the tetralemma. Within the passage there are two parts: first, the tetralemma of objective opposition against obstructive opposition; second, the subsequent-affirming proposition (anuloma) of objective opposition against cognitive opposition. This is the first. The first alternative is having objective opposition and not obstructive; the second alternative is having obstructive and not objective; the third is both; the fourth is neither; all are readily understood. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.2.15) - [Next: 2.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.2.17) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.2.16) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.2.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.2.16) · Pramāṇa