[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 20.47 # 俱舍論疏 20.47 俱舍論疏 20.47 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [20.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20.47) 論「若謂眾緣至許常有故」，牒救非也。眾緣和合即有作用，眾緣未合即無作用，由此作用時有時無，此救非理。即此眾緣亦許常有，由何得有和合、不和合時？ > On the Śāstra's statement: "If it is said that the assembly of conditions \[…\] because it is accepted that they are permanently existent": this takes up the defense and rejects it. When the assembly of conditions converges, there is activity; when the assembly of conditions has not yet converged, there is no activity—hence activity is sometimes present and sometimes absent. This defense is illogical: since these conditions themselves are also accepted to be permanently existent, by what means could there be times of convergence and non-convergence? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 20.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20.46) - [Next: 20.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20.48) - [Up: 20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.20.47) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20.47) · Pramāṇa