[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 20.55 # 俱舍論疏 20.55 俱舍論疏 20.55 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [20.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20.55) 論「彼復應說至名為已滅」，釋頌第三句也。若謂法體如現在有，先何所闕彼未有故名未已生？後復闕何彼已無故名為已滅？ > The Śāstra says: "They should also explain... is called 'already destroyed'": this explains the third line of the verse. If they claim that the substance of an entity exists just as the present does, what was it previously lacking, such that because it did not yet exist it was called 'not yet arisen'? And later, what is it lacking again, such that because it no longer exists it is called 'already destroyed'? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 20.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20.54) - [Next: 20.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20.56) - [Up: 20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.20.55) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [阿毘達磨俱舍論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.abhidharma.abhidharmakosa!bhasya*zh-xuanzang.20.12) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.20.55) · Pramāṇa