[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 24.52 # 俱舍論疏 24.52 俱舍論疏 24.52 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [24.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.24.52) 論「且總成三至根差別故」，此總分三，由三因也。唯有起業是中般，有起、生業是生般，有起，生，後業是上流。又下煩惱是中般，中煩惱是生般，上煩惱是上流。又上根是中，中根是生，下根上流。 > On the treatise passage, "First, forming three in general... due to the distinction in faculties": This divides them into three in general due to three causes. Having only karma that initiates \[rebirth\] is attaining parinirvāṇa in the intermediate state; having karma that initiates and produces \[rebirth\] is attaining parinirvāṇa upon rebirth; having karma that initiates, produces, and subsequently matures \[rebirth\] is the upstream practitioner. Furthermore, lower afflictions belong to attaining parinirvāṇa in the intermediate state; middling afflictions belong to attaining parinirvāṇa upon rebirth; upper afflictions belong to the upstream practitioner. Furthermore, superior faculties belong to the intermediate state; middling faculties belong to rebirth; inferior faculties belong to the upstream practitioner. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 24.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.24.51) - [Next: 24.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.24.53) - [Up: 24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.24) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.24.52) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.24.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.24.52) · Pramāṇa