[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 25.216 # 俱舍論疏 25.216 俱舍論疏 25.216 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [25.216](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.25.216) 「論曰至無為解脫」者，釋經中三界。即是前二解脫中無為解脫，體一無為，就三義別立三名也。《正理》七十二云「就三界體約假有異，若就實事無有差別。云何名為約假有異？謂離貪結名為離界，斷餘八結名為斷界，滅餘一切貪等諸結所繫事體名為滅界。何緣三界如是差別？謂有漏法總略有三：一者能繫而非能染、二者能繫亦是能染、三者非二順繫染法，故斷此三所證無為，如次名為斷等三界（述曰：言結遍一果等、貪自性貪等無為名離界。餘八，然法自性斷結等無為，名為斷界。餘往上緣縛斷時，名為餘滅界。即此九結及一果等，望他即是滅，望自即離斷。色不染法一向是滅，非總定別，故云假也。今詳《正理》俱不盡理，此之三體各別不相纏染法一向約自即八結名斷，貪名離也，餘法諸結無一名滅。此釋三別，於理為勝。若不爾，即三雜亂。然言假者，此三無為其性無別，皆得名為斷。名者是假，非實也、離滅也，就三有漏分三名）。」 > \[On the phrase of\] the śāstra, "The treatise says: up to unconditioned liberation," this explains the three realms in the sūtra. This is the unconditioned liberation among the two previous liberations; its essence is one unconditioned \[dharma\], and three names are established according to three distinct meanings. The Nyāyānusāra, fascicle 72, says: "In terms of the essence of the three realms, they differ only conventionally; in terms of real entities, there is no difference. Why is it said to differ conventionally? Freedom from the fetter of greed is called the realm of dispassion (virāga-dhātu); severing the remaining eight fetters is called the realm of severing (prahāṇa-dhātu); the cessation of all other entities bound by fetters such as greed is called the realm of cessation (nirodha-dhātu). For what reason are the three realms distinguished like this? Because contaminated dharmas are briefly summarized into three: first, those capable of binding but not capable of defiling; second, those capable of binding and also capable of defiling; third, those that are neither, which are dharmas conforming to binding and defilement. Therefore, the unconditioned realized by severing these three are named the three realms of severing and so forth respectively. (The commentary says: the unconditioned of the fetter pervading one fruit, etc., and the intrinsic nature of greed, etc., is called the realm of dispassion. The remaining eight, which are the unconditioned of severing the fetters that are the intrinsic nature of dharmas, are called the realm of severing. When the remaining upward-directed objective-support bonds are severed, it is called the remaining realm of cessation. These nine fetters and the one fruit, etc., viewed in relation to another are cessation, and viewed in relation to oneself are dispassion and severing. Non-defiled dharmas of form are strictly cessation; they are not fixed as general or specific, hence they are called conventional. Now examining the Nyāyānusāra, it is not completely reasonable: the entities of these three are distinct and mutually non-entangling. Non-defiled dharmas are strictly in relation to oneself; that is, the eight fetters are named severing, greed is named dispassion, and the remaining dharmas and fetters without exception are named cessation. This explanation of the three distinctions is logically superior. If not so, the three would be confounded. However, when saying 'conventional,' it is because the nature of these three unconditioned dharmas does not differ, and all can be named severing. The names are conventional, not real, being dispassion and cessation; the three names are divided according to the three contaminated \[dharmas\])." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 25.215](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.25.215) - [Next: 25.217](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.25.217) - [Up: 25](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.25) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.25.216) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (3) - [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.7.85) — Classical Chinese - [阿毘達磨順正理論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.abhidharma.abhidharmakosa!nyayanusara*zh-xuanzang.72.16) — Classical Chinese - [阿毘達磨藏顯宗論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.abhidharma.abhidharmakosa!abhidharmakosasastrakarikabhasya*zh-xuanzang.34.28) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.25.216](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.25.216) · Pramāṇa