[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 26.34 # 俱舍論疏 26.34 俱舍論疏 26.34 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [26.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.34) 「論曰至是名盡智」，明盡智相也。「智見明覺解惠光觀」，此即總列智之異名。決斷名智，推求名見，離闇名明，悟理名覺，了達名解，擇法名惠，光謂現照，觀謂觀察。此即名雖異，其體一也。故《正理》云「豈不二智非見性攝，如何乃言智、見、明等？有作是釋：乘言便故。然實二智是於後時所起見因，故亦名見。謂離盡智後出觀時，必不現行審察見故。先不動性及後練根得不動時，離無生智後審察見亦不現行，故此見名從果而立。或如見故假立見名，如立光名現照轉故。光是色處，智體非光，照用如光，名光無失。如是二智實非見體，現照如見，立以見名（已上論文）。」 > "The Śāstra states: \[...\] this is named the knowledge of exhaustion (kṣayajñāna)": this explains the characteristics of the knowledge of exhaustion. "Knowledge (jñāna), view (dṛṣṭi), clarity (vidyā), awakening (bodhi), comprehension (adhigama), discernment (mati), light (prabhā), and contemplation (vipaśyanā)": this is a comprehensive list of synonyms for knowledge. Decisive determination is called "knowledge"; inquiry and seeking is called "view"; freedom from darkness is called "clarity"; awakening to the principle is called "awakening"; thorough realization is called "comprehension"; selection of dharmas is called "discernment"; "light" means manifesting illumination; "contemplation" means observing. Thus, although the names differ, their entity is one. Therefore the Nyāyānusāra states: "Are not the two knowledges not subsumed under the nature of view? How then can it speak of 'knowledge', 'view', 'clarity', and so forth? Some give this explanation: it is for rhetorical convenience. Yet in reality the two knowledges are the causes of the views that arise at a later time; therefore they are also named 'view'. That is to say, when emerging from contemplation after \[the attainment of\] the knowledge of exhaustion, scrutinizing views will definitely not be active. When previously of an unshakeable nature, and when subsequently training the faculties to attain the unshakeable state, scrutinizing views will likewise not be active after \[attaining\] the knowledge of non-arising; therefore, this name 'view' is established from its result. Or, it is metaphorically given the name 'view' because it is like a view, just as the name 'light' is established because it functions as manifesting illumination. Light is the visible base (rūpāyatana), whereas the entity of knowledge is not light; yet its illuminating function is like light, so there is no error in calling it light. Likewise, the two knowledges are not actually the entity of view, but manifesting illumination is like a view, so they are designated with the name 'view' (end of text from the Śāstra)." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 26.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.33) - [Next: 26.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.35) - [Up: 26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.26.34) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.34) · Pramāṇa