[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 26.60 # 俱舍論疏 26.60 俱舍論疏 26.60 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [26.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.60) 論「若爾有心至離癡亦爾」，論主破此師說也。若謂治貪名離貪心，不治貪不染污心。不與貪相應故，非有貪心；不治貪故，非離貪心。此二心攝心不盡。餘師所說貪所繫故名有貪心，貪不繫者名離貪心。此即攝心盡，有癡等亦爾。論主取此師為正，此即類釋瞋、癡心也。 > On the Śāstra's statement: "If that is so, then there are minds \[…\] free from delusion is also like this": the author of the Śāstra refutes this master's explanation. If one maintains that counteracting greed is called a mind free from greed, then unpolluted minds that do not counteract greed, because they are not associated with greed, would not be minds with greed; and because they do not counteract greed, they would not be minds free from greed. These two categories of mind would fail to encompass all minds. What other masters say is that because it is bound by greed it is called a mind with greed, and what is not bound by greed is called a mind free from greed. This then encompasses all minds completely; the cases of minds with delusion and so forth are also like this. The author of the Śāstra adopts this master\['s view\] as correct, and this by analogy also explains minds with hatred and delusion. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 26.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.59) - [Next: 26.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.61) - [Up: 26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.26.60) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.60) · Pramāṇa