[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 26.77 # 俱舍論疏 26.77 俱舍論疏 26.77 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [26.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.77) 論「雖說非理至是散心故」，西方師通前難也。雖說眠相應染心，亦聚亦散過。我西方師不說眠相應染心為散心，但名聚心，復有何過？ > On the Śāstra's statement: "Although it was said to be illogical \[…\] because it is a distracted mind": the Western masters resolve the earlier objection. Although they said there is the fault of a defiled mind associated with sleepiness being both collected and distracted, we Western masters do not speak of a defiled mind associated with sleepiness as being a distracted mind, but only call it a collected mind; what further fault is there? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 26.76](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.76) - [Next: 26.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.78) - [Up: 26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.26.77) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.26.65) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.77) · Pramāṇa