<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.87 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 26.87

# 俱舍論疏 26.87

俱舍論疏 26.87

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [26.87](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.87)

論「此據作意至故無有失」，西方師答。經言修者，是欲修名修，非正修也。欲修名修，故散別無有失也。

> On the Śāstra's statement: "This is based on attention \[…\] therefore there is no error": the Western masters answer. When the sūtra speaks of cultivation, it means the desire to cultivate is called cultivation, not actual cultivation. Because the desire to cultivate is called cultivation, there is no error in them being separately distinct.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 26.86](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.86)
- [Next: 26.88](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.88)
- [Up: 26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.26.87) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.87](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.87) · Pramāṇa
