[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 26.89 # 俱舍論疏 26.89 俱舍論疏 26.89 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [26.89](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.89) 論「隨自意語至意不如是」，西方師總非不得經意。《正理論》曰「此彼二經意各別故。此經中說有貪等心，為令知心染、淨品別。謂為如實了知諸心黑品、白品差別理趣，說有貪心、離貪心心。彼經中說聚心、散心，為令了知修神足障。由彼經說『自審己心勿太沈、勿太舉，勿內聚、勿外散。』謂彼行者修神足時，應自審察修神足障，此心懈怠、此心掉舉、此心惛眠，此於色等非理作意所引流散。此、彼經意所為既殊，不可引彼經遮釋此經相。彼經但說修神足時，心於內外太聚、散失，不欲分別心染、淨相。此經所說與彼相違。雖諸染心皆有怠等，為顯諸染過失差別，隨其增位立沈等心、立策等心，應知翻此。故我宗釋符順契經，亦善分別諸心異相（述曰：此經者，謂明十一對心。彼經者，是西方師引難有部經也）。」 > On the Śāstra's statement: "Words according to one's own intention \[…\] the intended meaning is not like this": the Western masters generally reject this as failing to grasp the sūtra's meaning. The Nyāyānusāra states: "The intended meanings of these two sūtras are distinct. In this sūtra, it speaks of minds with greed and so forth in order to make known the distinction between defiled and pure categories of mind. That is, in order to truly understand the rationale of the differences between the dark category and the white category of minds, it speaks of minds with greed and minds free from greed. In that \[other\] sūtra, it speaks of collected minds and distracted minds in order to make known the obstacles to cultivating the bases of supernormal power. For that sūtra states: 'One should examine one's own mind, let it not be too depressed nor too elevated, let it not be inwardly collected nor outwardly distracted.' That is, when that practitioner cultivates the bases of supernormal power, he should examine for himself the obstacles to cultivating the bases of supernormal power: this mind is lazy, this mind is agitated, this mind has lethargy and sleepiness, this \[mind\] wanders and disperses driven by improper attention toward visible forms and so forth. Since the purposes of the intentions of this sūtra and that sūtra are distinct, one cannot cite that sūtra to negate the explanation of the characteristics in this sūtra. That sūtra only speaks of the mind being excessively collected or distracted inwardly and outwardly at the time of cultivating the bases of supernormal power, not wishing to distinguish the defiled and pure characteristics of mind. What this sūtra states is contrary to that. Although all defiled minds have laziness and so forth, in order to reveal the distinctions among the faults of defilements, depressed minds and so forth are established according to their predominant state, and uplifted minds and so forth are established as their opposite. Therefore, our school's explanation accords with the sūtra and also distinguishes well the distinct characteristics of the various minds." (The commentary says: "This sūtra" means the one explaining the eleven pairs of minds; "that sūtra" is the sūtra cited by the Western masters to challenge the Sarvāstivādins.) > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 26.88](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.88) - [Next: 26.90](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.90) - [Up: 26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.26.89) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [阿毘達磨順正理論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.abhidharma.abhidharmakosa!nyayanusara*zh-xuanzang.73.20) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.89](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.26.89) · Pramāṇa