[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 28.11 # 俱舍論疏 28.11 俱舍論疏 28.11 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [28.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28.11) 論「若爾即心至餘心所法」，經部難也。若專一所緣名之為定，即心專境依之建立，即此心王名三摩地，不應別有餘心所法名三摩地。 > The Śāstra states: "If so, then it is just the mind... other mental factors." This is the Sautrāntika's objection. If exclusive focus on a single intentional object is called meditative absorption, then it is established based on the mind itself focusing exclusively on an object; this primary mind itself is called samādhi, and there should not be a separate other mental factor called samādhi. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 28.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28.10) - [Next: 28.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28.12) - [Up: 28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.28.11) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28.11) · Pramāṇa