[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 28.62 # 俱舍論疏 28.62 俱舍論疏 28.62 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [28.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28.62) 論「若謂經說至無斯過者」，牒引兩經救也。以有經說一類天超段食，故知色、無色界無段食也。「又經說彼天喜為食故，無上二界有段食過」者，此述大眾部意。前所引文雖無簡別，別有此兩文有簡別，故知上二界定無段食。 > The Śāstra says: "If you say that the sūtra states \[...\] there is no such fault." This cites two sūtras used as a rescue argument. Because there is a sūtra stating that a certain class of devas transcends solid nutriment, one knows that the form and formless realms lack solid nutriment. "Furthermore, the sūtra states that those devas take joy as nutriment; therefore, there is no fault of the upper two realms having solid nutriment"—this expresses the Mahāsāṃghika's intention: although the previously cited text had no qualification, these two distinct texts have qualifications, and therefore one knows that the upper two realms definitely lack solid nutriment. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 28.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28.61) - [Next: 28.63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28.63) - [Up: 28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.28.62) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.28.62) · Pramāṇa