[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 29.27 # 俱舍論疏 29.27 俱舍論疏 29.27 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [29.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.29.27) 論「前雖說此至有情境故」，述不斷障有三因：一有漏根本靜慮攝故。此不斷惑，如前已說。二勝解作意相應起故。夫斷惑者共相作意，此是勝解，故不斷惑。三遍緣一切有情境故。夫斷惑者，緣於法境不緣有情，此緣有情故不斷惑。 > The Śāstra states: "Although previously it was said that these... up to: because their cognitive object is sentient beings." This explains that there are three reasons why they do not sever obstacles: First, because they are subsumed under the defiled fundamental dhyānas. As explained before, these do not sever defilements. Second, because they arise in association with mental application of resolved determination. Severing defilements requires mental application to universal characteristics, whereas these are resolved determination, hence they do not sever defilements. Third, because they universally take all sentient beings as their cognitive object. Severing defilements takes phenomena as object and does not take sentient beings as object; these take sentient beings as object, hence they do not sever defilements. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 29.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.29.26) - [Next: 29.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.29.28) - [Up: 29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.29) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.29.27) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.29.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.29.27) · Pramāṇa