<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.137 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 30.137

# 俱舍論疏 30.137

俱舍論疏 30.137

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [30.137](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.137)

論「若謂由待至非極成故」，破轉計也。彼計云：識不恒似前識者，由待我與實句色、意合，差別不同故，有異識生者，理定不然。我體是一，與餘意合，非極成故。此非兩宗共許，不成同也。

> On the Śāstra's statement: "If it is said that it is due to depending on \[...\] because it is not universally established": This refutes their shifted position. Their position says: the reason that consciousness does not perpetually resemble the preceding consciousness is that it depends on the contact of the self with the substance category (dravya-padārtha) of form and the mind, and due to these various differences, a distinct consciousness arises. This principle is definitely not so. The essence of the self is unitary; its contact with another mind is not universally established. This is not mutually accepted by both traditions, so it does not establish their thesis.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 30.136](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.136)
- [Next: 30.138](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.138)
- [Up: 30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.30.137) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.137](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.137) · Pramāṇa
