[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 30.138 # 俱舍論疏 30.138 俱舍論疏 30.138 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [30.138](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.138) 論「又二物合至俱有滅壞」，論主破意與我合也。二物合有分限，不可遍合。我遍一切處，意有分限故。又彼外道自釋合相言，非至為先、後至名合。我與意合，意有分限，我應亦有分限。意移轉故我應移轉，意壞滅故我應壞滅。若不爾者，何名為合？ > On the Śāstra's statement: "Furthermore, the contact of two things \[...\] would both have destruction": The author of the treatise refutes the contact of the mind with the self. The contact of two things has spatial boundaries; they cannot contact universally. The self is omnipresent, whereas the mind has spatial boundaries. Moreover, that non-Buddhist school itself explains the characteristic of contact by saying: non-reaching prior, reaching later is called "contact." If the self contacts the mind, and the mind has spatial boundaries, the self should also have spatial boundaries; because the mind moves, the self should move; because the mind is destroyed, the self should be destroyed. If it is not so, how can it be called "contact"? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 30.137](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.137) - [Next: 30.139](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.139) - [Up: 30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.30.138) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.138](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.138) · Pramāṇa