<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.23 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 30.23

# 俱舍論疏 30.23

俱舍論疏 30.23

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [30.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.23)

論「佛已遮故至故佛已遮」，論主引經遮也。佛言捨此蘊，及能續餘蘊，唯除五蘊法假，許有能續諸蘊，已遮別我。汝說實我捨取諸蘊，豈非所遮？

> On the Śāstra's statement: "Because the Buddha has already refuted it \[...\] therefore the Buddha has already refuted it": The author of the Śāstra cites a sūtra to refute them. The Buddha said that when casting off these aggregates and continuing with other aggregates, except for the nominal designation based on the dharmas of the five aggregates, no continuity of aggregates is accepted; thus a separate self has already been refuted. When you claim a real self casts off and takes on aggregates, how could that not be refuted?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 30.22](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.22)
- [Next: 30.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.24)
- [Up: 30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.30.23) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.23) · Pramāṇa
