[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 30.33 # 俱舍論疏 30.33 俱舍論疏 30.33 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [30.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.33) 論「若補特伽羅至命者即身」，犢子部難也。若不如我宗別有我者，謂即五蘊名命者等。世尊答外道問，何不記言命者即身？ > On the Śāstra's statement: "If the pudgala \[...\] the soul is identical to the body": The Vātsīputrīya objects. If it is not as our school says, that there is a separate self, but rather that the five aggregates themselves are called the 'soul' and so forth, why did the World-Honoured One, in answering the non-Buddhist's question, not declare that the soul is identical to the body? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 30.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.32) - [Next: 30.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.34) - [Up: 30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.30.33) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.33) · Pramāṇa