<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.71 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 30.71

# 俱舍論疏 30.71

俱舍論疏 30.71

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [30.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.71)

論「昔我即今，體應常住」，論主難也。汝宗計我非常、無常。若昔我即今我，應是常，違自宗也。

> On the Śāstra's: "If the past 'I' is the present, its substance should be permanent": The author of the Śāstra objects. Your school posits that the self is neither permanent nor impermanent. If the past "I" is identical with the present "I", it would have to be permanent, which contradicts your own school.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 30.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.70)
- [Next: 30.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.72)
- [Up: 30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.30.71) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.30.71) · Pramāṇa
