[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 4.13 # 俱舍論疏 4.13 俱舍論疏 4.13 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [4.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.4.13) 泰法師復引《發智》等論破念法師，為大謬也。又自釋云「故知婆沙初師一切四大必不離色、聲，一切欲界色必不離香、味，是正義也。」此更大謬。即違《婆沙》有四大無聲，此論、《雜心》無聲八等。念法師義既順論文，泰、光二師即謬破耳。 > Furthermore, that Dharma Master Tai cited the Jñānaprasthāna and other treatises to refute Dharma Master Nian was a great error. Moreover, his own explanation that 'hence we know that the first master of the Vibhāṣā—that all four great elements are definitely not separated from visible form and sound, and all desire-realm visible form is definitely not separated from fragrance and taste—is the correct view' is an even greater error. It directly contradicts the Vibhāṣā's statement that there are four great elements without sound, and the eight \[elements\] without sound and so forth of this treatise and the Saṃyuktābhidharmahṛdaya. Since Dharma Master Nian's position conforms to the text of the treatise, the two masters, Tai and Guang, merely refuted him erroneously. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 4.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.4.12) - [Next: 4.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.4.14) - [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.4) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.4.13) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.4.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.4.13) · Pramāṇa