[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 5.23 # 俱舍論疏 5.23 俱舍論疏 5.23 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5.23) 論「誰之異熟謂無想定」，辨其因也。《婆沙》一百十八有多師釋。「初師釋云：無想定感無想及色異熟。命根、眾同分是彼有心靜慮異熟。所餘諸蘊是俱異熟。復有說者：無想定感無想及色異熟。命根是彼有心靜慮異熟。所餘諸蘊是俱異熟。復有說者：無想定感無想異熟，所餘諸蘊是俱異熟。復有說者：若有心時亦感無心諸蘊異熟，若無心時亦感有心諸蘊異熟。評曰：應作是說。無想異熟唯無想定感。一切命根及眾同分等眼等色根，皆是業感。餘蘊俱感。」《正理論》云「此法一向是無想定所感異熟。由彼無想有情天中無想及色，唯是無想定所感異熟故。此定無力引眾同分及與命根，以眾同分及與命根唯是有心第四靜慮所感果故。彼處餘蘊是共異熟。」准《正理》文，同初師義，非評家義。此論云「誰之異熟謂無想定」，准此論文，唯與第四說別。前三師說及評家義，皆說無想是無想定果，唯第四說通有心果。 > On the text of the Treatise, "Whose maturation is it? It refers to the non-conception attainment (asaṃjñi-samāpatti)": This discerns its cause. Fascicle 118 of the Vibhāṣā contains the explanations of several masters. "The explanation of the first master says: 'The non-conception attainment produces non-conception and the maturation of matter. The life faculty (jīvitendriya) and generic similarity are the maturations of that dhyāna with mind. The remaining skandhas are joint maturations.' Another says: 'The non-conception attainment produces non-conception and the maturation of matter. The life faculty is the maturation of that dhyāna with mind. The remaining skandhas are joint maturations.' Another says: 'The non-conception attainment produces the maturation of non-conception; the remaining skandhas are joint maturations.' Another says: 'When mind is present, it also produces the maturation of the skandhas without mind; when mind is absent, it also produces the maturation of the skandhas with mind.' The verdict says: 'One should state it thus: The maturation of non-conception is produced solely by the non-conception attainment. All life faculties and generic similarities, as well as the physical sense faculties such as the eye, are produced by karma. The remaining skandhas are produced jointly.'" The Nyāyānusāra says: "This dharma is exclusively the maturation produced by the non-conception attainment. For among those gods of the non-conception sentient beings, non-conception and matter are solely the maturation produced by the non-conception attainment. This attainment lacks the power to induce generic similarity and the life faculty, because generic similarity and the life faculty are effects produced solely by the fourth dhyāna with mind. The remaining skandhas in that place are shared maturations." According to the text of the Nyāyānusāra, this agrees with the opinion of the first master, not the opinion of the verdict. When this Treatise says, "Whose maturation is it? It refers to the non-conception attainment," judging from this text, it differs only from the fourth view. The views of the first three masters and the opinion of the verdict all state that non-conception is the result of the non-conception attainment; only the fourth view allows it to be the result of \[states\] with mind. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.22](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5.22) - [Next: 5.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5.24) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.5.23) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [俱舍論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1821.5.25) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5.23) · Pramāṇa