[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 5.4 # 俱舍論疏 5.4 俱舍論疏 5.4 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5.4) 「論曰至名眾同分」，就長行中有二：一述有部宗、二引經部難。就述有部宗中，先總、復別。此名總也。「有別實物」，舉其體也。「名為同分」，述其名也。「本論說此名眾同分」，會異名也。 > \[On the passage\] "The Śāstra says: … is called generic similarity": Within the prose commentary there are two parts: first, setting forth the Sarvāstivāda school; second, citing the Sautrāntika objection. Within setting forth the Sarvāstivāda school, there is first the general and then the specific. This is the general: 'There is a distinct real entity' points to its substantial entity; 'is called generic similarity' states its name; 'the root treatise calls this multitude-similarity' harmonizes the variant names. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5.3) - [Next: 5.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5.5) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.5.4) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.5.4) · Pramāṇa