[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822) › 6.130 # 俱舍論疏 6.130 俱舍論疏 6.130 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.130](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.6.130) 論「相應因體至義何差別」，問也。心、心所法是相應因體，亦俱有因體。既是一因應無二，必應於中有其別相。如是二因有何差別？ > The treatise says, "What is the difference in meaning \[...\] between the essential nature of the associated cause?" which is a question. Mind and mental factors are the essential nature of the associated cause, and also the essential nature of the coexistent cause (sahabhū-hetu). Since they are one cause, there should not be two; there must necessarily be distinct characteristics between them. What is the difference between these two causes? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.129](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.6.129) - [Next: 6.131](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.6.131) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822~en-mt.6.130) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.6.130](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1822.6.130) · Pramāṇa