[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論頌疏論本](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823) › 19.33 # 俱舍論頌疏論本 19.33 俱舍論頌疏論本 19.33 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [19.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.19.33) 從此第二，別明戒禁取者，論云：「若於非因起是因見，此見何故非見集斷（解云：既迷因起，應見集斷也）？」頌曰： > From this second \[section\], specifically clarifying the attachment to rules and vows: The treatise says: "If this is a view giving rise to \[the judgment of\] a cause with respect to what is not a cause, why is this view not abandoned by the vision of the origin (samudaya)? (The commentary explains: Since it arises from delusion regarding the cause, it ought to be abandoned by the vision of the origin.)" The verse says: > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 19.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.19.32) - [Next: 19.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.19.34) - [Up: 19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.19) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823~en-mt.19.33) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.19.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.19.33) · Pramāṇa