[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論頌疏論本](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823) › 7.36 # 俱舍論頌疏論本 7.36 俱舍論頌疏論本 7.36 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.7.36) 釋曰：欲界善生九者，謂從欲界善心無間容生九心，謂自界四心、色界二心、無色一心、無漏二心，故成九也。色界二心者，謂善、染污也。從欲界心入色界定，生彼善心。又從欲界善心中死，往生色界，生彼染心，續生心中必染污故。故論云：「於入定時及續生位，如其次第生善染心。」無色界一心者，謂從欲界善心中死，生無色界，生彼染心，續生心中必染污故。欲界不生無色善心者，以極遠故。無色於欲界，四遠故遠：一所依遠、二行相遠、三所緣遠、四對治遠。所依遠者，無色界心不與欲界心為所依故。行相遠者，無色界心唯於第四禪作苦麁障行相，必無緣欲作苦麁等行相故。所緣遠者，不緣欲故。對治遠者，未離欲界貪，必無能起無色界定，能為欲界惡戒等法厭壞及斷二對治故。無漏二心者，謂從欲界加行善心入學、無學觀也。 > Explanation: "Wholesome of the desire realm gives rise to nine": this means that from a wholesome mind of the desire realm, nine minds may immediately arise—namely, four minds of its own realm, two minds of the form realm, one mind of the formless realm, and two uncorrupted minds; thus making nine. As for the two minds of the form realm, they are wholesome and defiled. Emerging from a desire-realm mind to enter the absorption of the form realm, one gives rise to that \[realm's\] wholesome mind. Furthermore, dying with a wholesome mind of the desire realm and taking rebirth in the form realm, one gives rise to that \[realm's\] defiled mind, because the mind of rebirth-linking is necessarily defiled. Thus the treatise states: "At the time of entering absorption and at the stage of rebirth-linking, wholesome and defiled minds are produced in respective order." As for the one mind of the formless realm, it means that dying with a wholesome mind of the desire realm and taking rebirth in the formless realm, one gives rise to that \[realm's\] defiled mind, because the mind of rebirth-linking is necessarily defiled. > > The desire realm does not give rise to a wholesome mind of the formless realm because it is extremely remote. The formless realm is remote from the desire realm due to four kinds of remoteness: first, remoteness of basis (āśrayadūratva); second, remoteness of mode of apprehension (ākāradūratva); third, remoteness of objective sphere (ālambanadūratva); and fourth, remoteness of antidote (pratipakṣadūratva). Remoteness of basis means that a mind of the formless realm does not serve as the basis for a mind of the desire realm. Remoteness of mode of apprehension means that a mind of the formless realm operates only upon the fourth dhyāna with the mode of apprehension of \[it being\] painful, gross, and an obstruction, and never takes the desire realm with modes of apprehension such as painful and gross. Remoteness of objective sphere means that it does not take the desire realm as an object of cognition. Remoteness of antidote means that before one has abandoned desire-realm craving, one definitely cannot generate an absorption of the formless realm to serve as the two antidotes—revulsion and abandonment—against bad morality and other such phenomena of the desire realm. > > As for the two uncorrupted minds, they mean entering the contemplation of the trainee or non-trainee from an applied wholesome mind of the desire realm. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.7.35) - [Next: 7.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.7.37) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823~en-mt.7.36) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.7.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.7.36) · Pramāṇa