<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.8.49 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [俱舍論頌疏論本](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823) › 8.49

# 俱舍論頌疏論本 8.49

俱舍論頌疏論本 8.49

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [8.49](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.8.49)

未至應至處，故中有非生者，答第二問。中有已起，不名生者，謂未至彼當來所應至處，是故中有不名為生。論云：「何謂當來所應至處（問也）？謂引異熟究竟分明，是謂當來所應至處（答也）。」解云：中有唯天眼見故，昧劣不明也。

> "Because it has not arrived at the place it should arrive, intermediate existence is not 'birth'": this answers the second question. Although intermediate existence has arisen, it is not called 'birth' because it has not yet reached that future place it should arrive; therefore, intermediate existence is not called 'birth'. The treatise says: "What is meant by the future place it should arrive? (This is the question.) It refers to when the projected vipāka is completely and distinctly realized; this is called the future place it should arrive. (This is the answer.)" The explanation says: Because intermediate existence is seen only by the divine eye, it is obscure, weak, and indistinct.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 8.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.8.48)
- [Next: 8.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.8.50)
- [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.8)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823~en-mt.8.49) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.8.49](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1823.8.49) · Pramāṇa
