<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1.11 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 1.11

# 瑜伽論記 1.11

瑜伽論記 1.11

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1.11)

印度本音稱曰瑜伽，唐無正名，如瞿通九義無當一名，故置本音。今安瑜伽意亦如是，且就一義名曰相應，釋論總出體云：謂一切乘境行果等所有諸法，皆名瑜伽。一切竝有方便善巧相應義故。此中意說三乘所有境行果法竝名瑜伽。其境與行果，其行與果法，竝有方便善巧相應義故，方便善巧之體。若依十度以後得智而為自體，顯內顯外二善巧故，唯以別境慧為其體性。今此善巧依釋下文，以作意、慧二法為性。若於此作意，復於此證達。故境行果皆不相違，注心洞融竝不乖故。按釋論中境行果三，各三別釋。

> The original Indian pronunciation is called yoga. Tang Chinese has no exact term, just as \*go\* encompasses nine meanings with no single name corresponding to it; hence the original phonetic form is preserved. The present retention of 'yoga' is based on the same intention. For the moment, according to one meaning, it is called conjunction. The Commentary explains its essence in general, saying: 'All phenomena such as the objects, practices, and fruitions of all vehicles are called yoga, because they all possess the meaning of conjunction with skill in means.' Here the meaning is that all phenomena of objects, practices, and fruitions belonging to the three vehicles are named yoga. Because their objects, practices, and fruitions—and their practices and fruition phenomena—all possess the meaning of conjunction with skill in means. As for the essence of skill in means: if based on the ten perfections, it takes subsequent wisdom as its intrinsic nature, because it reveals the two skills of internal and external, taking only wisdom among the specific-object mental factors as its essential nature. Now, this skill, according to the explanation in the text below, takes the two phenomena of mental engagement and wisdom as its nature. If one engages the mind in this, one also realizes and penetrates this. Thus object, practice, and fruition are not mutually contradictory; when one focuses the mind and penetrates them in harmony, none of them conflict. According to the Commentary, the three—object, practice, and fruition—are each explained in three distinct ways.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1.10)
- [Next: 1.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1.12)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.1.11) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [瑜伽師地論釋](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.yogacaryabhumisastrakarika*zh-xuanzang.1.7) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1.11) · Pramāṇa
