[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 1.582 # 瑜伽論記 1.582 瑜伽論記 1.582 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.582](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1.582) 界者因義，順經部宗，色能持種說有彼界，或彼聚中別有能生彼色等用，增上緣中立為界稱，有師妄計，若得天眼亦得彼地身根，不相離故，其義不然。雜心頌曰：極微在四根，十種應當知，身根九餘八，此說有香地。迦延亦言：頗有成就彼地眼不成就，彼地身根耶？曰：有。謂身在欲界起天眼通，故知彼說非理。相攝者體攝也，各自以體對用也。不相離攝者，體用不相離也，或一大中，有塵無塵風等者，乘言故來有塵，意取無塵也，或二中亦應有，或堅及動如風搖樹無煖無濕等時，或三中如熱濕樹有三無風，又動樹時有濕無煖皆但有三，或四者可知。 > An element (dhātu) means a cause; conforming to the Sautrāntika school, form can hold seeds, so it is said to have that element; alternatively, within that aggregation there is a distinct capacity capable of producing that form and so forth, which is designated an element among sovereign conditions. Some masters falsely hypothesize that if one attains the divine eye, one also attains the body faculty of that stage, because they are not separated; this meaning is not correct. The Saṃyuktābhidharmahṛdaya verse says: 'Subtle atoms in the four faculties / Should be known as ten kinds; / In the body faculty there are nine, and in the rest eight'—this refers to stages having odor. Kātyāyana also said: 'Can one accomplish the eye of that stage without accomplishing the body faculty of that stage?' Answer: 'Yes, namely when one's body is in the desire realm and one arouses the divine eye higher knowledge.' Therefore we know that their explanation is irrational. Inclusion by characteristics means inclusion by substance, each using its own substance to correlate with its function. Inclusion by non-separation means non-separation of substance and function. \[The phrase\] 'or in one great element, there is wind with dust or without dust and so forth' is stated by extension to mention having dust, but the intention is to take being without dust; or among two, there should also be \[such instances\], or firmness and mobility, as when wind shakes a tree without warmth and without moisture, etc.; or among three, as in a hot, moist tree where there are three without wind, and when shaking a tree there is moisture without warmth, in both cases having only three; or four, which can be understood. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.581](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1.581) - [Next: 1.583](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1.583) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.1.582) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1.582](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.1.582) · Pramāṇa