[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 13.64 # 瑜伽論記 13.64 瑜伽論記 13.64 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [13.64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13.64) 又彼外計非一種識能持一切根，一一因識能持自根，今應破之。故第四因云：又六識身各別轉乃至是第四因。此中有二：初依計正破，二縱計逐難，謂如眼識起時餘耳等無識之根便應爛壞（宗），無能持識故（因），以小乘宗諸識不並生故猶如死屍（喻）。 > Furthermore, that outsider posits that it is not that a single consciousness can sustain all faculties, but that each causal consciousness can sustain its own faculty; this must now be refuted. Therefore, the fourth reason states: 'Furthermore, the groups of six consciousnesses evolve individually... up to... is the fourth reason.' Herein there are two parts: first, directly refuting according to the posited view; second, conceding the posited view to pursue the objection. This means: for instance, when the visual consciousness arises, the remaining faculties such as the ear, lacking consciousness, should rot and disintegrate (thesis), because they lack a sustaining consciousness (reason), since in the Hīnayāna school the various consciousnesses do not arise simultaneously, just like a corpse (example). > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 13.63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13.63) - [Next: 13.65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13.65) - [Up: 13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.13.64) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13.64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13.64) · Pramāṇa