[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 13.79 # 瑜伽論記 13.79 瑜伽論記 13.79 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [13.79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13.79) 述曰：然以道理逐之，必許有此四業及信大乘教而得成立，以理逐者。旦立唯識比量云：色等諸法，皆不離識（宗），是所識故（因），猶如於識（喻），既色等諸法，不離於識，從識而現，無識之時，此境應無，且如入無心定或唯緣涅槃等境，爾時色等無能緣之識，眼等諸根及外器等須應斷絕。 > The commentary explains: However, pursuing it with reason, one must accept that these four activities exist and, by having faith in the Mahāyāna teaching, they can be established. Regarding pursuing it by reason: first, one establishes the syllogism of consciousness-only, stating: 'Phenomena such as form are all not separate from consciousness (thesis), because they are what is cognized (reason), just like consciousness (example).' Since phenomena such as form are not separate from consciousness and appear from consciousness, when there is no consciousness, these objects should not exist. Take, for instance, entering mindless concentration or solely taking nirvāṇa and other such objects as intentional objects; at that time, form and the rest have no cognizing consciousness, so the eye and other faculties as well as the external receptacle and so forth should necessarily be cut off. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 13.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13.78) - [Next: 13.80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13.80) - [Up: 13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.13.79) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13.79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.13.79) · Pramāṇa