[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 14.17 # 瑜伽論記 14.17 瑜伽論記 14.17 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [14.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.17) 何以故乃至不應道理者，此破正量部等，應先成有剎那已，方可破無行動。應先立量云：諸色塵等應剎那滅，色蘊攝故，如燈焰鈴聲。燈焰鈴聲他共許故。方立量云：無有此所之色往至餘處，剎那滅故，如燈焰等。此剎那滅因方是極成。 > Regarding the passage from "Why is that?..." up to "is not reasonable": this refutes the Saṃmatīya and others. One should first establish that momentariness exists; only then can one refute the absence of movement. One should first set up a syllogism: All material sensory data and the like must perish momentarily, because they are subsumed under the form aggregate, just like the flame of a lamp or the sound of a bell. The flame of a lamp and the sound of a bell are mutually accepted by others. Only then does one set up the syllogism: There is no form reaching this place that travels to another place, because it perishes momentarily, like the flame of a lamp, etc. This reason of "momentary perishing" is then fully established. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 14.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.16) - [Next: 14.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.18) - [Up: 14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.14.17) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.17) · Pramāṇa