[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 14.60 # 瑜伽論記 14.60 瑜伽論記 14.60 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [14.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.60) 第六明不許扇搋等受出家戒。扇搋迦者，一向無根，或天生無根及為他害，總名扇搋迦。半擇迦者，此云多染污，通有根無根。下文云：天生無根是扇搋，亦是半擇迦一分，半擇男勢或起不起。唯半擇迦被害無根者，若不被他於己為過，唯扇搋迦。若被他污，即通二種，則成二句。一、唯扇搋迦非半擇，被害無根樂能非所。二、唯半擇迦非扇搋，謂有根男勢或起不起等。三、是扇搋亦是半擇。天生無根及被害無根，樂為能所者是。云何得知天生無根通樂能所，以準被害無根中，云不被他污唯名扇搋迦。若被他污則名二，將知天生無根，通樂為能所，俱名二人。然其受護所有學處福等差別者，此通外難，難意，扇搋等果報劣故，所受律儀不違男女故，通意云：若以等心受五戒者，福德無別。 > The sixth explains not permitting ṣaṇḍhas and others to receive the ordination of leaving home. A ṣaṇḍha is entirely devoid of faculties, either naturally born without faculties or mutilated by others; these are collectively named ṣaṇḍha. A paṇḍaka is translated here as 'of much defilement', encompassing both having faculties and lacking faculties. The lower text says: naturally born without faculties is a ṣaṇḍha and also a portion of paṇḍaka; a paṇḍaka's virility may arise or not arise. One who is only a paṇḍaka having faculties mutilated by others: if not subjected to wrongdoing upon oneself by others, is solely a ṣaṇḍha; if defiled by others, then it encompasses both kinds, thus forming two propositions: 1. Solely a ṣaṇḍha and not a paṇḍaka: one mutilated without faculties who delights in being active and not receptive; 2. Solely a paṇḍaka and not a ṣaṇḍha: one having faculties whose virility may arise or not arise, etc.; 3. Both a ṣaṇḍha and a paṇḍaka: those naturally born without faculties or mutilated without faculties who delight in being both active and receptive are such. How is it known that one naturally born without faculties encompasses delighting in both active and receptive? By analogy with those mutilated without faculties, where it says not being defiled by others is solely named a ṣaṇḍha, while if defiled by others it is named both; thus we know that those naturally born without faculties encompass delighting in both active and receptive, and are designated both persons. However, regarding the differences in merit and so forth in their undertaking and guarding all trainings: this resolves an external objection. The thrust of the objection is that because the karmic retribution of a ṣaṇḍha and the like is inferior, the moral code they undertake does not contravene men or women. The thrust of the resolution says: if one undertakes the five precepts with an equal mind, there is no difference in merit. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 14.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.59) - [Next: 14.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.61) - [Up: 14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.14.60) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.14.60) · Pramāṇa