<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.16.44 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 16.44

# 瑜伽論記 16.44

瑜伽論記 16.44

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [16.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.16.44)

基云：今解不然，違顯揚文。又根本餘勢分，如男女三無漏，皆取彼所依根一少分為體，似本色心，此依上假立不是所依相之分，故言無所屬。非謂通依五心所上立也。

> Ji says: the present explanation does not hold this, as it contradicts the text of the Prakaraṇāryavācā. Furthermore, \[with other faculties that are\] functional parts derived from a primary faculty—such as the male, female, and three taintless ones—all take a portion of the faculty on which they rely as their substance, resembling the original form or mind. This \[life faculty\] is established nominally upon \[the consciousness\] and is not a part of the characteristics of that on which it relies; therefore it is said to have nothing it belongs to. It does not mean that it is established across the five mental factors.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 16.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.16.43)
- [Next: 16.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.16.45)
- [Up: 16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.16)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.16.44) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.15.62) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.16.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.16.44) · Pramāṇa
