[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 17.41 # 瑜伽論記 17.41 瑜伽論記 17.41 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [17.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.17.41) 大乘宗中，且五十八云：見所斷惑名無事者，隨根本說。若修所斷薩婆多宗無見性故，唯說有實，我亦有見故，說亦無事，故言通二。餘文準此解其理也。 > Within the Mahāyāna tradition, when fascicle fifty-eight says that afflictions abandoned by seeing are called lacking an objective referent, it is stated according to their root. As for those abandoned by cultivation, because the Sarvāstivāda school holds no view-nature, it solely says there is a real entity; in our tradition, there is also view, hence we say they also lack an objective referent, which is why it says they apply to both. The remaining texts should be understood in their principle based on this. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 17.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.17.40) - [Next: 17.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.17.42) - [Up: 17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.17) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.17.41) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.17.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.17.41) · Pramāṇa