<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.18.75 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 18.75

# 瑜伽論記 18.75

瑜伽論記 18.75

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [18.75](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.18.75)

答：中二義。一者、若有超越證不還者，依第四定起煖等時，作十六行觀安立諦故，應如聖道斷二縛極清淨，然不許爾，故有相心不斷縛；二者、若彼有相道，能斷二縛者，即應與出世道無有差別，然有差別故不應理。

> The answer contains two points: First, if there were one who leaps beyond to realize the state of a non-returner, relying on the fourth dhyāna to arouse the \[stage of\] heat and the like, because they cultivate contemplation of the conventional truth through the sixteen aspects, they should sever the two bondages with utmost purity just like the noble path; yet this is not accepted, and therefore a mind with marks does not sever the bondages. Second, if that path with marks were able to sever the two bondages, then it should have no difference from the supramundane path; yet there is a difference, and so it is not reasonable.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 18.74](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.18.74)
- [Next: 18.76](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.18.76)
- [Up: 18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.18)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.18.75) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.18.75](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.18.75) · Pramāṇa
