<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.201 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 2.201

# 瑜伽論記 2.201

瑜伽論記 2.201

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.201](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.201)

第三難亦二：一、破應是常，量云：住未來世與現在為緣之法應是常住，不遷流故，如無為法；二、應本無今生、非未來法生，謂若彼為緣，而得生者，便異法生，非未來生，此於未來便為未有，量云：現在應非未來法生，未來中無故，猶如過去。

> The third challenge also has two parts: 1. Refuting that it should be permanent. The syllogism is: The dharma that abides in the future time and serves as a condition for the present should be permanent, because it does not transition, like unconditioned dharmas. 2. It should originally not exist and now arise, and not be the arising of a future dharma: that is, if it arises by having that as a condition, then a different dharma arises, not the future dharma arising, so this would be non-existent in the future. The syllogism is: The present should not be arisen from a future dharma, because it does not exist within the future, just like the past.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.200](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.200)
- [Next: 2.202](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.202)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.2.201) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.201](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.201) · Pramāṇa
