<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.225 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 2.225

# 瑜伽論記 2.225

瑜伽論記 2.225

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.225](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.225)

第二徵云：為唯由此法自體起此覺耶等者，此意問：於所覺境自體，起我覺為於餘處，若於所覺法自體起我覺者，汝如何說即蘊計我，名為顛倒？量云：汝執色我心應非顛倒，許順所緣故，如他心智等。

> The second interrogation says: ‘Does this awareness arise solely from the own-nature of this dharma, etc.?’ The intention here is to ask: does the awareness of self arise from the own-nature of the cognized object, or from elsewhere? If the awareness of self arises from the own-nature of the cognized dharma, how can you say that asserting a self identical with the aggregates is called inverted? The syllogism is: The mind grasping form as the self in your assertion should not be inverted; because it is accepted as conforming to its intentional object; like the knowledge of another's mind, etc.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.224](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.224)
- [Next: 2.226](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.226)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.2.225) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.3.44) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.225](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.225) · Pramāṇa
