[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 2.232 # 瑜伽論記 2.232 瑜伽論記 2.232 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.232](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.232) 第二徵破無常者，此所作因，體是變異；執我有作，不應理等者，所作者生義，所作之因體，是變異無常之法，我是作者，仍言有常而有所作，不應道理。量云：我應非常，有所作故，如麁地等，若是常者，我應無所作，以是常故，如虛空等。 > The second interrogation refutes impermanence: regarding ‘The cause of this action is intrinsically transformative; to assert that the self acts is illogical, etc.’: ‘that which is made’ has the meaning of being produced; the cause of that which is made is intrinsically a transformative and impermanent dharma. If the self is the agent, yet you say it is permanent and acts, this is illogical. The syllogism is: The self should be impermanent; because it acts; like gross earth, etc. If it were permanent, the self should perform no action; because it is permanent; like space, etc. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.231](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.231) - [Next: 2.233](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.233) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.2.232) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (2) - [瑜伽師地論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.yogacarabhumi*zh-xuanzang.6.138) — Classical Chinese - [瑜伽師地論略纂](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1829.3.45) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.232](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.232) · Pramāṇa