<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.6 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 2.6

# 瑜伽論記 2.6

瑜伽論記 2.6

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.6)

謂釋論破第二師云：已離欲者，下地諸法名無尋伺等；未離欲者，上地諸法應名有尋有伺等，由此應成雜亂過去。測法師云：又助難，若依離欲立三地者，中間根本同縛同離應成一地，有雜亂過。

> Namely, the Commentary refutes the second master, saying: For one who is already free from desire, the factors of the lower stages would be named \[the stage\] without investigation and reflection, and so forth; for one not yet free from desire, the factors of the higher stages should be named \[the stage\] with investigation and with reflection, and so forth; hence the error of confusion would result. Master Ce states: As a further objection, if the three stages are established on the basis of freedom from desire, then the intermediate and fundamental \[absorptions\], sharing the same bondage and the same freedom, should become a single stage, which entails the error of confusion.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.5)
- [Next: 2.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.7)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.2.6) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.2.6) · Pramāṇa
