[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 24.26 # 瑜伽論記 24.26 瑜伽論記 24.26 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [24.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24.26) 問：此無漏道云何名斷？下解以超越義故，名斷。非由煩惱離繫名斷。第二、苦速，第三、樂遲一分應斷者，第二有苦義，第三有遲義，故一分應斷，速義樂義，不應說斷。非唯由此者，非但一清淨能得涅槃也。亦非離此者，然不離此一清淨也，上來四頌解緣起訖。 > Question: How is this taintless path called 'abandonment'? Below it is explained: because of the meaning of transcendence, it is called abandonment; it is not called abandonment by reason of being disjoined from afflictions. 'The second, painful \[progress with\] swift \[comprehension\], and the third, pleasant \[progress with\] sluggish \[comprehension\], are partially to be abandoned': the second has the aspect of painfulness, and the third has the aspect of sluggishness; therefore, a portion is to be abandoned. The aspects of swiftness and pleasantness should not be spoken of as abandonment. 'Not merely by this': it is not that by one single purification alone one can attain nirvāṇa. 'Nor apart from this': yet one is not apart from this single purification. Up to here, the four verses explaining dependent origination are concluded. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 24.25](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24.25) - [Next: 24.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24.27) - [Up: 24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.24.26) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24.26) · Pramāṇa