[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [瑜伽論記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828) › 24.47 # 瑜伽論記 24.47 瑜伽論記 24.47 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [24.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24.47) 第二明得方便中略有四種瑜伽。善方便者乃至此二所攝名不放逸者，景師云：此文以念慧二法為不放逸，前本地及對法以三善根及以精進為不放逸。泰師又云：善方便是不放逸，不放逸即以念正智二法為體，不同餘文四種瑜伽。達師云：問兩文不同有何所以？答但是一切善法并是不放逸，各取義不同，故如是也。 > Second, in explaining the attainment of means, there are briefly four kinds of yoga. Regarding "excellent means... up to what is subsumed under these two is named non-negligence," Master Jing says: This text takes the two dharmas of mindfulness and wisdom as non-negligence, whereas the preceding Maulī Bhūmiḥ and the Abhidharma take the three wholesome roots and vigor as non-negligence. Master Tai also says: Excellent means is non-negligence, and non-negligence takes the two dharmas of mindfulness and correct knowledge as its essence, unlike the four kinds of yoga in other texts. Master Da says: Question: What is the reason for the difference between the two texts? Answer: It is simply that all wholesome dharmas are non-negligence; each takes a different sense, and therefore it is like this. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 24.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24.46) - [Next: 24.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24.48) - [Up: 24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828~en-mt.24.47) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1828.24.47) · Pramāṇa